|


|
Clockwise from top left:
|
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
|
Gray treefrog
Dew bumblebee on a teasel
Bearded seal, Wood Bay, N.W.T.
Alpine, grassland, and shoreline
ecosystems at Castle River, Alberta
Morel |
|
|
In
1992, Canada ratified the United Nations Convention
on Biological Diversity, as did many other countries.
This convention is necessary because the present rate
of loss of biological diversity, or "biodiversity,"
is a serious global environment threat.
Just what is biodiversity, and what does it have to
do with wildlife? Why is biodiversity important? How
much is it declining globally and in Canada? And what
can be done to protect it?
What
is biodiversity, and what does it have to do with
wildlife?
Biodiversity means the variety of life on Earth. It
is measured as the variety within species (genetic
diversity), the variety between species, and the variety
of ecosystems.
Diversity is a characteristic of life everywhere on
Earth, from the ocean floor to inside the human gut,
and at every geographical scale, from the global to
the microscopic. We see this diversity around us every
day. We see genetic traits in people, in our pets,
and in plants. We know, firsthand if we are lucky,
the rich variety of mammal, bird, fish, and plant
species in the world. And some of us have lived in
strikingly diverse ecosystems - in coastal forests
and on arctic tundra, in cities and on farms. However,
all this is only a small part of the diversity of
life.
Remarkably little is known about biological diversity.
One reason is that most species (and many ecosystems)
are a lot smaller than humans. Furthermore, each species,
whether a tiny virus or a huge humpback whale, has
its own genetic diversity, which, in an average species,
involves millions of different pieces of genetic material.
And to map the genetic code of even one species is
an enormous undertaking.
About 1.6 million of the world's species have been
described. Estimates of the total number of species
range from 12 to 118 million. The numbers for known
and total estimated species are continually being
revised. Viruses are almost entirely unknown. About
1 million of the known 1.6 million species are insects,
and millions of insect species are still unclassified.
Some 360,000 algae, fungi, and vascular plants have
already been described, and botanists estimate that
there are at least another million left to be classified.
Animals like nematodes (e.g., worms) and crustaceans
(e.g., shrimplike animals) are not well known. Our
knowledge of mammals and birds is much more complete,
but "new" species - species previously unknown to
science - are occasionally discovered. For example,
a new primate (the black-faced lion tamarin) was found
in 1990, a new whale (the pygmy beaked whale) in 1991.
And as scientists probe unexplored areas of the planet,
they continue to find new species, all with unique
gene pools, belonging, in some cases, to hitherto
unknown ecosystems. Thanks to deep-sea vessels and
cameras, bacteria and higher life forms (e.g., worms)
have recently been discovered in the ultra-hotwater
vents, kilometres below the ocean surface, where no
life was thought to be possible.
You do not need to visit exotic places, however, to
see strange, unknown organisms and unfamiliar ecosystems.
A look through a microscope at ordinary soil reveals
countless (mostly nameless!) microorganisms, in addition
to the worms and insects that can be seen with the
naked eye. Figure 1 shows a few of the underappreciated
life forms found in the soil of a deciduous forest
in eastern Canada. The oribatid soil mite shown in
the drawing is one of the most common soil mites in
Canada, but it has not yet been scientifically studied
or given a scientific name. Soils are, in fact, complex
microecosystems. For example, fungi on tree roots
help trees absorb nutrients. And without the insects,
fungi, earthworms, and bacteria that transform dead
plants and animal carcasses into soil, piled up dead
matter would quickly smother all but a few strong-growing
trees and bushes!
Wildlife, defined as all wild species, makes up most
of the species and genetic diversity of life. Wildlife
includes more than mammals and birds living in wilderness
areas . Each form of virus, soil organism, plankton,
and insect, no matter where it lives, is a wild species,
as are the species of parasites and microorganisms
that live in such places as under human fingernails
and on the feather shafts of wild birds. The remainder
of species diversity, apart from the human species,
is life forms that we have domesticated: e.g., species
and cultivars of crops and garden plants and species
and breeds of pets and livestock. However, despite
their importance to people and their sometimes huge
populations, domesticates account for only a tiny
fraction of the millions of existing species and of
the genetic diversity within species.
Some people refer to regional ecosystems that seem
to have developed without human dominance as "natural"
or "evolved" ecosystems: Canadian examples are the
ancient temperate rain forest ecosystem on Vancouver
Island and an ecosystem found on the untrawled ocean
floor. Today, natural ecosystems and "wild lands and
waters" (i.e., ecosystems in which humans and wild
populations coexist) have become small arks holding
a large proportion of the variety of the world's species
and genes, often in small populations.
Canada's
biodiversity
In Canada, people have recorded 71,000 species of
plants and animals and estimate that there may be
as many again to be discovered. (This is not counting
viruses, which microbiologists are only beginning
to identify). Overall, Canada has fewer species than
have tropical countries, but it contains species specially
adapted to cold climates. It also contains free-ranging
populations of large mammals, such as polar bears,
grizzlies, caribou, and wolves.
We are fortunate in Canada to have remnants of time-tested
natural ecosystems. The most extensive are in the
northern and western parts of the country. As well,
throughout much of rural Canada there are large areas
of wild lands and waters, where people trap, extract
oil and gas, build roads and communities, and otherwise
carry on with their lives, altering, but not driving
out, the original assemblages of species. It should
be possible, with proper management, to maintain high
levels of ecosystem, species, and genetic diversity
in these places.
Almost half of Canada is forest land. About 23% of
the country is arctic or alpine tundra. Canadian river
runoff to the sea is about 10% of the world's total
freshwater runoff, and Canada has more lakes than
any other country, many more than it has been possible
to plumb. Canada contains one-quarter of the remaining
wetlands on the globe, mostly in vast northern expanses
of marsh and bog.
Wetlands in estuaries (of which Canada has an abundance)
rank with coral reefs and intensive agriculture as
the most productive ecosystems: in estuarine wetlands
a few species of plants grow quickly, providing food
and nursery areas to a wide variety of animals. Canada
has other species-rich marine ecosystems off its coasts,
for example, the Grand Banks off Newfoundland and
the kelp forests off British Columbia.
Why
is it important that life remain diverse?
For
its own sake
The Convention on Biological Diversity recognizes
the intrinsic value of biodiversity. Each life form
and ecosystem has its own intrinsic value, apart from
any actual or potential usefulness to people. When
a species goes extinct, it never returns.
To
sustain life as we know it
We, like all species on Earth, are utterly dependent
on the planetary environment. Species and ecosystems
provide life-sustaining services, such as maintaining
adequate oxygen in the atmosphere, removing carbon
dioxide from air, filtering and purifying water, pollinating
plants, breaking down waste, and transferring nutrients.
Most ecosystems that evolved to provide these services
can cope with some loss of diversity: for example,
when a species becomes extinct, a new species may
step in to take over its role in the ecosystem.
But there are limits to the protection that this flexibility
provides. When species that cannot be replaced are
lost, the whole assemblage of species may change,
and rare species and their genes may disappear. Nor
can this flexibility protect ecosystems against excessive
modifications to harness their productivity strictly
for human purposes. For example, the dustbowl on the
prairies in the 1930s resulted in part from the ploughing
up of native prairie grasses with massive soil-anchoring
roots. Ploughing transformed the prairie grassland
ecosystem. The plants and animals that were adapted
to periodic drought were displaced. The new ecosystem,
based on crops planted by people, provided social
and economic benefits in wet years. In dry years,
the soil simply blew away. Erosion of valuable topsoil
still occurs and is a serious problem.
Furthermore, most Canadians develop a great aesthetic
appreciation of nature as it exists and do not want
to be deprived of it. Canadians of many backgrounds
place spiritual value on animals, plants, and ecosystems.
Canadians do not wish to leave a biologically impoverished
Earth to their children and grandchildren.
Insurance
for the future
Maintaining the full range of the Earth's biodiversity
means maintaining the flexibility to respond to unforeseen
environmental conditions. For example, many of Canada's
native plant species must endure both hot summers
and cold winters. These plants may, therefore, have
genetic material that could be used to develop agricultural
crops that can withstand greater than normal temperature
ranges.
Because natural ecosystems have stood the test of
time, we can use them as models of sustainability.
As long as we conserve them, we can return to them
to learn how to refine or reengineer the croplands,
managed forests, and industrial fishing areas that
we have created, or to find the genes, species, or
microecosystems that were left out of the human-designed
system because we were ignorant of their importance.
Long-term
human health and prosperity
Preserving biodiversity will also maintain our potential
as a country to be creative and productive and will
provide opportunities for discovering and developing
new foods, medicines, and industrial products. Because
other species face some of the same biological problems
as we do and share the same "genetic alphabet," the
biochemical evolution that has been occurring in their
populations through millions of generations has produced
substances of great usefulness to people. For example,
doctors use hirudin, a substance discovered in the
saliva of leeches, to dissolve dangerous blood clots.
Canada's 138 native tree species have at least 40
recorded pharmaceutical or medical uses, and they
are currently used for rayon, cellophane, methyl hydrates,
glue, and turpentine.
What
is happening to biodiversity?
Global
changes
Species go extinct in the normal course of evolution.
But the rate of extinctions in the world has greatly
increased in recent centuries because of the activities
of the huge and growing number of people. The human
population now appropriates 20 - 40% of the solar
energy captured by land plants, leaving less for all
other species. E.O. Wilson, a world expert on biodiversity,
has calculated that, due to the reduction in area
of the tropical rain forests alone, making no allowance
for overhunting or invasion by alien organisms, today's
rate of extinction of species is 1,000 - 10,000 times
the rate suggested by the fossil record, which was
about one species per million species a year.
Many whales and dolphins are threatened. Roughly 116
of the world's 200 species of apes and monkeys are
threatened with extinction. And when larger animals
go extinct, so, too, does a universe of microscopic
organisms that lived on their bodies and waste materials.
The world's grassland ecosystems have, for the most
part, already been converted to crops or pasture.
Temperate forests have been logged over and fragmented
by roads, railways, and power corridors, which improve
access for wild and domestic predators, people, and
invasive species, resulting in disruption of ecological
processes. More recently, species-rich tropical rain
forest ecosystems have been greatly reduced in area.
Wetlands continue to be drained for agriculture and
urban expansion. Coral reefs may be in worse condition
than either forests or wetlands. Wild lands and waters,
and even stringently protected wilderness areas, are
vulnerable to oil spills, acid rain, sedimentation,
radioactive dust, long-lasting toxic chemicals, and
invasive plants and nonnative animals.

| This
map was prepared by the State of the Environment
Directorate, based on a system used by Environment
Canada to classify Canada's ecosystems. The
country's land and ocean ecosystems have been
summarized at various levels. The largest category
is ecozones; these are subdivided into ecoregions,
ecoregions are made up of ecodistricts, and
so on. |
Canadian
losses
The greatest threat to biodiversity in Canada is the
extensive alteration by people of a number of ecological
regions, largely because of competing land uses such
as agriculture and urbanization. The map shows which
areas of Canada people have altered the most. The
prairies and southern Ontario have been greatly transformed.
Only a few hectares of the tallgrass prairie remain
intact, and southern Ontario's Carolinian forest survives
only in scattered woodlands. Old-growth forests exist
only in patches in the three Maritime provinces, only
small stands of old red and white pines remain in
central Canada, and the unlogged temperate west coast
rain forest keeps shrinking.
In settled parts of Canada, wetlands, which are among
the habitats richest in species, have been reduced
by as much as 90%, and drainage, at least on private
lands, shows little sign of abatement. Despite legislation
to curb acid precipitation, it is predicted that we
will continue to lose the fish, shellfish, and amphibian
communities of thousands of small lakes in eastern
Canada. The Great Lakes ecosystem has been greatly
altered by intensive fishing and successive invasions
of species, some deliberately introduced to create
recreational fisheries, combined with other stresses,
such as pollution and alteration of habitat. In Atlantic
coastal waters, there has been a considerable reduction
of genetic diversity in populations of northern cod,
as well as the depletion of stocks of most food fishes.
Most of the species native to these regions at risk
still exist in Canada, but their populations have
been greatly reduced or fragmented. In some cases,
this has already reduced the genetic diversity within
species, which gives species the best change to adapt
to future stresses through selection. For example,
the 12 or 13 forms of lake trout in Lake Superior
have been reduced to only two or three.
Because most Canadian species are widely distributed,
we have lost relatively few known species compared
with tropical region. Since about 1750, Canada has
lost the Great Auk, Passenger Pigeon, Labrador Duck,
Dawson caribou, sea mink, Banff longnose dace, deepwater
cisco, longjaw cisco, and blue walleye. We do not
know exactly how many more wild species are in danger
of a similar fate, because we have not studied all
Canadian wildlife.
While these losses have been going on, Canada has
also been gaining species. A number of wild species
that now form an integral part of our fauna or flora
were deliberately introduced, such as the European
Starling and several ornamental plants. Others were
accidentally imported and in some cases have proved
exceedingly difficult and costly to control, such
as wild oats, zebra mussels, and the fungus responsible
for Dutch elm disease. It is prudent not to create
conditions that will result in our own native species
being displaced.
What
can we do to protect biodiversity?
It is important to prevent further losses. The geological
evidence suggests that biodiversity does not recover
quickly, at least in human time scales. Fossils indicate
five previous major periods of extinction, the most
recent being the extinction of the dinosaurs. After
each previous extinction event it appears to have
taken millions of years for life to regain former
levels of diversity.
A
global effort
The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity,
which Canada played a leading role in developing,
provides an opportunity for countries to work in partnership
on this complex global issue. It supports those working
for sustainable development in all signatory countries.
The convention addresses daunting global challenges:
protection of wilderness, management of other areas
for diversity, sustainable use of the components of
biodiversity, and equity between rich and poor countries
in sharing the costs and benefits of conserving the
Earth's biological wealth.
How
can we conserve biodiversity in Canada?
We must continue to survey our country's flora and
fauna to learn what exists and what needs protection.
We can continue to set aside areas where activities
disruptive to ecosystems or harmful to wildlife are
not allowed (e.g., parks, wildlife management areas,
ecological reserves, etc.). The federal, provincial,
and territorial governments are committed to protecting
areas representative of Canada's terrestrial and marine
natural regions and have instituted policies to try
to protect and restore critical wildlife habitats,
such as wetlands.
Canada has a program to identify and rehabilitate
species known to be critically endangered. We should
continue to regulate hunting, fishing, and logging
and to control the use of toxic chemicals. Canadian
laws require the planners of large projects, like
dams, to assess the likely consequences of their proposed
projects on the environment before the final decisions
to proceed are made.
We need to determine the scale at which biodiversity
should be conserved and carry out broad-scale landscape
planning. We can't have a moose in every backyard,
or Bald Eagles nesting near every pond.
One of the most crucial and potentially rewarding
tasks is the study of wild areas and species. One
of the things we must learn is how to extract income
from wild lands and waters without damaging them.
In Canada, trapping fur-bearing animals, hunting,
collecting seaweed, fishing, tapping maple trees for
syrup, logging in ecologically sound ways, and gathering
(e.g., wild foods, medicines, craft materials) can
all generate incomes from wild lands and waters in
a sustainable fashion.
All Canadians have a role to play in maintaining biological
diversity at present levels. We do not have to stop
fishing, farming, logging, and building cities in
order to preserve biodiversity, but we do have to
limit these activities or at least do them in ways
that are compatible with native ecosystems. This often
means reintroducing species to increase biodiversity
on farmland, in forest plantations, and even in cities.
To meet Canada's obligations under the Convention
on Biological Diversity, the federal, provincial,
and territorial governments are developing a national
biodiversity strategy. The biodiversity strategy,
when implemented by governments, will guide the efforts
of groups, individuals, businesses, and communities
that wish to participate in the national effort to
conserve biodiversity. To learn more about Canada's
national biodiversity strategy contact:
The Biodiversity Convention Office
Environment Canada
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H3
Phone: (819) 953-4374
Reading
list
 |
Biodiversity
Science Assessment Team. 1994. Biodiversity in
Canada: a science assessment for Environment Canada.
Environment Canada. Ottawa. 245 pages. (Separate
summary document also available). |
 |
Global biodiversity. A quarterly journal. Canadian
Museum of Nature. Ottawa. |
 |
Mosquin,
T., P.G. Whiting and D.E. McAllister. 1995. Canada's
Biodiversity: the variety of life, its status,
economic benefits, conservation costs and unmet
needs. Canadian Centre for Biodiversity, Canadian
Museum of Nature. Ottawa. |
 |
Ryan,
J.C. 1992. Life support: conserving biological
diversity. Worldwatch Paper 108. Worldwatch Institute.
Washington, D.C. |
 |
Wildlife
Ministers' Council of Canada. 1990. A wildlife
policy for Canada. Canadian Wildlife Service,
Environment Canada. Ottawa. |
 |
Wilson,
E.O. 1992. The diversity of life. The Belknap
Press of Harvard University Press. Cambridge,
Massachusetts. |
|